I'm Trash

3 hours ago, Mako said:

Where is BEEF?

Officially quit Arma 3. 
- You wont be seeing them on the server for a long or at all anymore I'd assume

3 hours ago, ACAB said:

Whats the problem with going back to a black and white situation of

in=save

out=not safe.

Rule: Do not abuse safezone godmode.

PS;Traders are not like Disneyland, they can be camped.

 

 

 

 

 

Thats the EXO mindset you got on you still ACAB. 
- Its been talked about and discussed and its not gonna change to that on this server   . 

- The whole ideology of discussing what sort of scenarios can happen or not happen is gonna be more of a hassle than its worth mate. 
- Report the dude fleeing and eventually he'll be banned for it. If you dont feel like doing that cause its time consuming, lets be honest. Then that fault is on you for not caring enough about the guy fleeing from you while being actively shot at. 
- If you're at the border of the red zone, obviously you're not supposed to turn around. Why I mentioned 300m in particular.... But in all honesty and its what I've done. If I get shot at even if I'm 50-100 meters from the zone. I still drive around the circle and find another entry just to make sure that I dont have to deal with a salty guy that believes he could've killed me before I reached that red zone . 

- Think logically when you encounter this stuff, everyone deals with these scenarios and we all handle them in a different manner. The group you play with @ACAB tends to rush into the safezone and start yelling at them in russian or in verbal english. Which me for is not the correct way of telling a guy that there's a rule against what he just did. But thats a topic for another day

Long story short since we're all loving these long ass posts. 

Dont combat evade. If you think you might combat evade. Then drive around the circle to avoid hassle or continue your path and have an admin decide whats gonna happen if the guy reports you. Simple simple   

Its very simple and how we determine if its a combat evade. 

- If you're being actively shot at while fleeing into the safezone. Doesn't matter if you're 300m out or 4km. Then you cant go into the " No Pvp Zone " and essentially that means the " Safezone " in its entirety. (If you've been chased, give it a solid minute to see you're still being shot before going to the safezone. That way you avoid any hassles) 

- About you managing to get into the gunner seat, then yes. Since the driver is the "owner" of set vehicle. Then he can do what he wants. You cant really shoot at him or do anything that would otherwise be able to kill him in that scenario. So unless your buddies manage to keep him in combat by actively shooting at him. Then he's fully allowed to do whatever he wants with that vehicle. 

- People flee to the safezone if they dont wanna lose their stuff, that mindset is unavoidable and will always happen. The rule states " Do not combat evade ". Thats being shot at, We always say. If you've been chased and haven't recieved any bullets flying towards you for a solid minute or so. Then you're free to go into the safezone. 
- Not everyone can be pleased and yes. Chasing a vehicle just to see them go into the safezone is something we've all dealt with. Even the ones among us on the admin staff here. But simply for you chasing a vehicle but not able to shoot at them does not make a valid reason for them not to go into the safezone. Multiple factors involve in this as well.

Are they aware they're being shot at
Are they aware that they're being chased
How long ago was it they were getting shot at
etc etc etc. 

I'm sorry that you've end up in these situations where you get frustrated. But if you're not shooting at the lad. Then he's free to go.


Regards: I'm Trash

I'm not gonna deny the suggestion. What I am gonna say is that we've had this conversation with the community, by my count atleast twice. 

Both times people have had mixed feelings about a day and night cycle even if its only 20 minutes of light darkness. 
We've come to the conclusion that people just dont want it. They think it sounds nice and then when experiencing it they suddenly dont want it anymore.

Exile is sadly made this way Tyler

- if you hit the limit which in this case is 300 parts. So upon moving an object it creates a new ID for that part, but it also saves the old one. If that makes sense, so until you put that particular part in the place you wanna put it. You'll have 2 potential parts while moving something. Atleast according to how Exile decided to count its parts 

- So as LiveJasmin Says. Stay 1 part below the max and this should never happen. Its also what we suggest to anyone who asks about this problem  . 

@Half Sack . When I first joined the server that was something I was used to not being there as well. 

We talked a long time made posts on forums and so on. As much as I'd want it I had to accept that the majority of the community doesn't seek that way of playing. 
- So as Rosco said. Its been mentioned and sadly we must inform you it wont happen. 

Regardless of your thoughts Jimlad. This is not a discussion thread, people team up every day. From small to big groups. So unless its an idea then we dont need to discuss about why some teams have this issue   

We've talked about the territory permissions and what it grants you and doesn't grant you when added to the territory. Right now simply being added allows you to move/remove baseparts. But doesn't allow you access to the virtual garage or the convenience of not typing in codes for your base doors. In our eyes being able to move parts in a territory without being promoted is a risk when befriending new people on the server. 

So we want to know what the community think and if an option you think is better that isn't listed here, then feel free to leave a reply and we'll take it into our consideration as well. 

Not heard any of that. Pretty sure thats fake news mate. Sorry to dissappoint you

So, instead of hammering on about this group doing this and this group doing that. 

- As I can see its 2 groups going at each other with each their own view of the situation, so lets accept the fact that, that is never gonna change. 
- So I think both parties has said their meaning in this matter. So leave it be and wait for the staff to make a decision on what to do about this.   

Could simply be boiled down to a combination of increased price and mass of the rockets themselves (or perhaps only the mass). 

- How it would be scaled would have to be looked into. But surely the 2 teams discussing here should reach an understanding simply by doing that.
- But thats just my 2 cents on the topic.

Penny. The admin tools does the exact same as you " removing " an object on your base.
- it deletes the tower and leaves a crate behind. 

https://gyazo.com/9570c47605b3f900dfdc9f75fdbd3ed5 

Is the box left when something gets deleted Penny . 

Honest mistake when deleting the corpses that was already stripped around the base. 
- Most likely spamming the delete button and accidently raised the crosshair a bit too much   . 

And on that note we're leaving it there  . 
- Dont wanna listen to the 2 bigger groups saying this and that and who did what and when. 

- There is negatives and positives about this event from what I have gathered. Its in the past, so if you want to continue arguring then do it in private   . 

If you find a mod that with their license allows us to add it to the SG mod. Then it can atleast be discussed   .

Both of those helicopters are owned by a license that prevents us to put it on the server without removing our monetization. Unless the owners of CUP decides to change this at some point, they wont ever be added. 

- I'm Trash -

the NWAF is not packed with objects compared to other servers I've played on. There is a whole half of the airstrip not used for the exact purpose of saving fps. 

We can't just delete 50 % of the map with the purpose of increasing fps. The map would look empty as hell then. 

The main issue is the amount of vehicles, which last time I checked was at 1300-1400.
The amount of building objects due to people being allowed 2 bases.
Server fps when I've checked it is steady and not in the danger field.

I'm happy that you're thinking about increasing server fps. But at this point its not the custom content I'm afraid. Personally my pc is not even average and I manage to pull 40fps on the most fps heavy places on Chernarus.
With that said, I dont see it happening that we're getting rid of 50 % of the current NWAF, Ghost Town, Island etc. Just my own opinion ofc. 

I dont see why it couldn't happen.
- Only thing that comes to mind is that its easier to get rid of stuff you want to put on the inmate market instead of risking going to trader.

- With that said. The idea might be brought up on the next staff meeting   . 

If you feel like making it, be my guest mate. It tells you the armor values etc ingame. 
- Sorry if I came across as rude. But its not something we've considered needed. 

Sorry if that answer disappoint you.

Believe this has been discussed once. 
- Main issue with that is that people such as yourself with no money issues can change their perks depending if they want to raid someone or if they feel like farming respect etc. 

- Choose your points wisely before selecting them!   

Yeah, sorry. Personally I'm not a fan of having anything regarding safezone storages. As Jimlad said, experienced it before and it got abused loads. Sure there is a way to limit what you can and cannot do.
- But at the end of the day. People that wants to fly in planes will find a way to abuse it somehow. 

- In my head, buying a plane and using it is a high risk, high reward. People like @ImUnleasheD spent hours upon hours in the editor trying to perfect landing the Spitfire at his base on Chernarus. 
- I think your mind is in the right place, but I would really not like to see it become a thing on the servers.

@Conzole Its a good thing that he is only taking the piss like he was regarding this

I'll look into it @ACAB .

The idea is nice and its something we've already talked about trying to do. 
- Only major problem is that the AI run off the ships and starts swimming in the water. So until a solution for that has been made. It'll have to be a thought put on hold.