Tor Augustsson

just put in the AA Nyx into the rotation

Nick aliens will be available in the campaign, but as of now even on the test branch editor there are no hidding objects on or below map but i would be playing on it if it was a exile server.

5 hours ago, Rosco Coltrane said:

While spectating a player on Cherno last night he shoot 3 rockets into a Bobcat at CDF before it blows also seen hunters die to 1 rocket as usual, so no idea where you got this information about, i'll go out in debug and test it a little later just to be 100% sure

i know the artillery tanks are not in here but those tanks have alot more armor and u can take them out with one wellplaced rocket, same with bobcat and panther

7 hours ago, MrAndy said:

So because I see a lot of numbers thrown around I decided I have very little to do with my life and went ahead and tested it properly. Below you can see a comparison of 3 different positions and environments on Isla Abramia, this was done while the server was at capacity and shit was going down. Keep in mind this is testing with the normal amount of grass applicable to all terrain settings, as you can find it on the server currently. Turning down grass density for them all may or may not increase performance, though I would suspect it would from the drop of FPS in Low to Standard. I have obviously also turned off all admin tools, as they are known to dump FPS out the window. lul

 

Settings: What I believe to be the most optimal settings for gameplay on my machine, I.E. the settings I always use when playing or otherwise, all settings except terrain will remain the same throughout the testing so should not impact performance or cause any variations that wouldn't otherwise be there due to terrain. Not 100% scientific but a whole lot better than just taking a rough number from a random point on the map. 

 

Hardware: Intel i7 4770k @3.9GHz (Because I is stupid and lazy)
                 GTX 1080ti
                 16 GB RAM
                 SSD

                 1440p 140Hz Monitor

 

 

Location: 076085
View: Looking NNW 320 degrees, both a mountain and large amount of grass in frame.

Low terrain:            Average of about 49 FPS, lowest point 45 FPS.
Standard terrain:    Average of about 44 FPS, lowest point 42 FPS.
High terrain:           Average of about 44 FPS, lowest point 42 FPS.
Very High terrain:   Average of about 44 FPS, lowest point 41 FPS.
Ultra terrain:           Average of about 40 FPS, lowest point 38 FPS.

 

 

Location: 008075
View: Looking E 90 degrees, big mountain, a town, a river, and small amount of grass in view. Generally very a busy scene.

Low terrain:            Average of about 33 FPS, lowest point 29 FPS.
Standard terrain:    Average of about 32 FPS, lowest point 31 FPS.
High terrain:           Average of about 32 FPS, lowest point 30 FPS.
Very High terrain:   Average of about 32 FPS, lowest point 30 FPS.
Ultra terrain:          Average of about 30 FPS, lowest point 28 FPS.

 

 

Location: 016063
View: Looking NNW 340 degrees, mostly only buildings and a town view, slight bit of grass and mountain in the background.

Low terrain:            Average of about 35 FPS, lowest point 33 FPS.
Standard terrain:    Average of about 34 FPS, lowest point 32 FPS.
High terrain:           Average of about 33 FPS, lowest point 32 FPS.
Very High terrain:   Average of about 32 FPS, lowest point 31 FPS.
Ultra terrain:          Average of about 30 FPS, lowest point 28 FPS.

 

 

From what I can tell from these tests and on my computer, the best option would probably be Very High terrain with modified grass, turned down as far as it'll go. A compromise to try and fix the terrain bug, as well as minimizing the amount of performance hit that Ultra brings for not too much benefit. That is if anything is to be done to begin with.

 

help me.

with all these numbers that said i still get around 60 fps with terrain on ultra whilst on low terrain i get around 40 fps

11 hours ago, Winky said:

????????

i play on ultra terrain with a i7 3760k xeon and gtx 1060 SLI

2 hours ago, Paperkat said:

Forced graphics settings alienates those with bad computers. I think it's just something people need to deal with (the mountains disappearing that is). If you've played on a3 panthera it was an issue there too, and we all just learned to live with it.

forced graphic settings doesn't alienate anyone you get better fps with terrain on ultra than on low.

2 hours ago, Jimlad said:

 

Yes and no one wants to alienate anyone. But I would guess 90+ % have a pc that can play a game that is 5 years old now. 

 

Other options can be disabled / enabled like view distance to give those people with a lesser pc the FPS they need. 

 

It's better for have lower view distance than to be able to look at people through mountains. 

my pc is about to turn 6 years old but. i get more frames with terrain on ultra than on low.

Bergen Size is 480 and the new one is 600 so it's not that big of a difference imo, just like double the price from 950 to 1900 or something.

Hived servers wouldn't be fun for anyone.

ofc the hype is real we've been playing cherno for ages it's time for something new, time to set out on a new vast adventure.

it's actually nice that the servers won't be hived cause that means no one gets ahead so to speak.

i like it alot

i would like to see this mod implemented into the server makes you think twice about how many mags of a certain gun u want to take, like you can't have 20 mags of ksvk ammo and more ammo for some other gun. you have to think about weight you're carrying i've played like 3-4 days on a server with this mod on it and it works fine no despawning of ammo or the weapon itself.

Use of ingame mechanics when you can use rappel as a ropeswing.

jimlad all you do is sit in balota all the time lmao with your grp.

WhiskeyDick is only making this post cause someone rekt him yesterday pawnee prices are good as is.